我也來談綠卡

其實你有沒有綠卡　我才不介意　
只是行政院長自己要知道　
找這樣想腳踏兩條船的人　
到頭來倒楣的還是自己　
至於人才不人才　國際化不國際化　
現在已經21世紀了　
政府的設計是19世紀的產物　
有那麼難嗎　你也幫幫忙!
而且看到目前為止也沒看出啥有趣的政策
說他們不是蠢材　就已經是在褒獎他們了
坦白說這個島上一大半的人
對自己也好　
對這個政府也好　
對這座島也好　
根本沒有信心所以才想拿綠卡來自衛　
只是覺得這些人很可憐　
因為她們的內心一定充滿著恐懼和不安　
這樣的人會是人才也很拼　
民心也好市場也好是現實也善變的
想討好的人一定會吃虧的
不如認真作事　把自己放下　以客為尊
自然會有好的ROI.

　

Comments

[Fred]

The issue here is the concept of "public service" and "mandatory sacrifice" do not apply to politicians in Taiwan.

The president Ma himself set a bad example so no one cares about the rules and regulations about the vetting process before a cabinet post is assigned.

An army contractor here in the US would require extensive background checks and "loyalty" testing and declaration.

The validity of security clearance, citizenship and the PR (green card) status is determined by a special court. It is not something indivdual can declare by himself without proper paper work and procedure.

Chinese and Taiwanese likes to take the ambiguity route so the society condone the leagal "gray" area as long as the performance meet expectation. A "don't ask, don't tell" ploicy might work for a developing nation but not a norm for a "developed" nation.

Ask any Chinese if they would allow Hu or any cabinet members to have a green card or dual citizenship. Is Taiwan has a lower standard than China on this issue?

Dishonesty is a trademark of this new admistration in Taiwan so it is too hard to ask the cabinet members who lie about their background to leave their posts now.